Anyone use Certainteed Grand Manor or Carriage House shingles?

It looks like the roof on our 1890's Victorian is shot and we need to replace it this summer.  It will be a complete tear off (2 existing layers of asphalt shingles).  Although the existing 1" sheathing looks good with only small gaps between the boards, we will probably do new plywood over the entire roof anyway just to be sure the new shingles have a good hold on something.  The roof is a 12/12 pitch with multiple valleys and ridges.  

I'd like to do something different than the standard architectural shingle but need to stay with asphalt shingle (no slate, no cedar shake) because of the cost.  So, I'm looking at Grand Manor and Carriage House line of shingles from Certainteed.  Has anyone used these?  Has anyone used both at the same time to make a pattern?  Grand Manor has a square bottom and Carriage House is scalloped, so I was thinking of 4 rows of each repeating up the roof.  They appear to be a very heavy shingle and I'm worried they are a difficult to work with - for example, they require an open valley because they are so thick/heavy that the do not bend well.  I'm also worried about the weight - 425 lbs per square, which is almost double standard shingle weight.  There is no way I'm doing this myself and I found a roofer who seems willing to use them and do the pattern, but I don't know if he has ever used these particular shingles before.


...John O.

Views: 5572

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

With the extra weight of the sheeting, heavy shingles may be too much for your rafters.  You may want to consult an engineer.  If you are in a snow climate, you may really create a weight issue.

My initial rough guess was it should be ok since we currently have two layers of standard 3 tab shingles up there (so probably about 400 lbs per square up there now) and the new shingles will be 425 lbs.  But then add more for new plywood + snow load (yes, I am in Northeast PA - so we do get a good amount of snow) and it might be too much.  Good point.  I guess a structural engineer would be able to do the computations and give a yes/no answer.


I would look into an engineer because we live in Nebraska and I worked at a college with an old building that needed new shingles.  They wanted to put shakes on it because that was original in 1888.  Only problem was, they were too heavy for the roof so they had to install I-beams to support the extra weight.  Don't want this to happen to you.


JaMa House at Wordpress

I'd have to check our records (I'm being lazy) but I think we used GAF Camelot "Antique Slate" (which is similar to CertainTeed's Grand Manor) on the main roof (9/12 & 12/12 pitches) and CertainTeed Carriage House (maybe "Gatehouse Slate") on the tower 17?/12 pitch). 

We considered doing a pattern, similar to what you describe, but opted out because each style has slightly different overlap requirements (because of Carriage House's beveled corners) and there'd be some mismatch of the alternating seams from one row to the adjacent.  Also, there's a slight thickness difference between the two which could impact both appearance and the warranty (what little that actually matters). 

Our roofer had extensive experience with both GAF's and CertainTeed's Luxury shingles (thanks to the multi-million dollar homes on Long Island) so we took his advice about the possibility but difficulty (there was also a small added labour charge for doing a pattern because of the care required).

The GAF Camelot was less expensive than the CertainTeed Grand Manor but has a very similar look, and (I think) is lighter (though not a factor for us).

Note: The fine print of the warranties reveal they're fairly worthless so don't let that be a deciding factor in your decision.  The warranties appraises the annually depreciated cost of the shingle (not incl. labour) based on it's its stated effective life in order to assign replacement value.  The manufacturer will determine whether or not failure was caused, in whole or part, by "faulty" installation and decrease the replacement value accordingly.  Check the installation instructions and don't deviate from them....get them into your roofing contract.

One note about the pattern: If you search "images" of slate/cedar roofs, which combine square with scalloped, you may find most tend to have 3-5 rows of square, from the ridge, with 3-5 scalloped, then 5-10 square, then 2-5 scalloped....  I think such a pattern makes the scalloped look more delicate, an accent, and more visually appealing.  IMO.

I also agree with the other comments about checking the weight load.  However, a 12/12 tends to have fewer problems (concerns) than post-traditional 9/12s.

Oh wow, the GAF Camelot look very similar to the Grand Manor. I see the Camelot have slightly different specs: 7.5" exposure, 17" x 34" where the Grand Manor and Carriage house are identical specs: 8" exposure and 18"x36". So, I think it is safer to stay with the same manufacturer. Also, Certainteed actually encourages mixing the two types to do a pattern and tells you how in the install guide, so I feel pretty safe doing it as far as the warranty is concerned and the different shingles lining up properly on the roof.

I've had fun looking on the web and around town for original slate roofs and the various patterns that some have. I pretty much see everything. However, most common is starting with 5 to 7 rows of square and then just use the scallop (maybe 3 rows) as an accent in between groups of square. That's what I'm leaning towards if my roof can support it.

I do see Certainteed makes two other singles that have square bottoms and are supposed to be slake-like: Hatteras and Highland Slate are both the same size as the carriage house. They are flatter than the Grand Manor but much less weight. Of course, Certainteed doesn't say anything about mixing those with Carriage House because they want to sell you the most expensive ones: the grand manor!

Ok, time to start calling some structural engineers....
...John O.
I had a structural engineer look at the roof and his initial reaction was that it would be very difficult to do an exact load calc on the roof because of the complex shape. Also, to make it more complicated, the code would not take into consideration that the structure is full dimensional old growth lumber that is capable of supporting more weight than modern nominal sizes. He took some measurements and we had a few follow up conversations. The final conclusion was it probably should be ok. His reasoning was if the roof can support two layers now and we don't replace it with more weight then it should be fine.

We also realized that the walls of the house have no exterior sheathing or diagonal bracing. It is balloon frame construction with the wood siding (clapboard) nailed directly over the 2x4s. Anyone else encounter this? The engineer was really surprised and said he never saw a house built without bracing of any sort.

I may try to get another opinion.

Balloon construction was very common 80-125 years ago because the trees were old and they could cut long lengths at the saw mills.  This construction style had a flaw in it that building would twist with the wind.  No cross bracing.  Floor joists were attached to the long studs with nails.  Not a lot of strength, but much cheaper to build.

Yeah, I'm not surprised about he "cheaper to build" part - even though our house is "Queen Anne" style, it is really just a modest / average middle class Victorian.  Nothing overly ornate or fancy.  I knew it was balloon framed (found that out when I was running wires in the walls), but I always assumed there should be some sort of exterior bracing or sheathing over the studs.  The structural guy didn't think the lack of bracing impacted the roof weight load too much and I guess if it lasted 100+ years like this without twisting, then it is probably ok.

I am just a homeowner with no experience regarding roofing. However, we used Certainteed Carriage House in our c.1880 Eastlake. We had up  4 layers of roofing, including original cedar shingles. We had to plywood the entire roof too. It looks great and the company that installed them did not consider it was an issue with weight. Did I mention 12x12 pitch and a tower? Anyway, good quality and we are pleased with the result. If you like I can send you a picture. Just email me. Best of luck!

Hi Iris,
That's a really great looking house! Eastlake is my favorite. Good to know that you liked the Carriage
House shingle and it has held up well. Those are almost as heavy as the Grand Manors. I want to use a few rows of them as an accent, although I really like the shape and actually did think about doing the entire roof in carriage house before I got the two shingle pattern idea. That's really crazy you had 4 layers on the old roof! If you can, email a picture of the new roof.

I had another structural engineer come out to look at the roof and her initial response was that it should probably be ok.  However, after looking further, she started mentioning something about collar ties.  It appears the roof rafters are about 24" on center and my ceiling joists are less - maybe 16", so they don't always line up and in some cases the roof rafter is not attached to a ceiling joist (I hope I'm explaining this correctly).  And when they are next to each other attached, they are just nailed.  

The firm is going to run some calcs and get back to me with an answer.

She was also surprised that the house had to exterior sheathing and said my wood siding was probably adding strength to the walls and if I ever remove it, I would need to add exterior plywood.


Just a follow up on the roof project...

I received the report from the second structural engineer and she did recommend adding new 2x6s alongside any existing roof rafter that exceeded 13' 9" in the central pryamid section of the roof.  So, we need to re-enforce 7 roof rafters in the center and re-enforce the one cracked rafter in the back.  The longest 2x6 is 16' 9".  I'm going to use LVLs.  I ordered the lumber but my roofer is going to do the work.

At this point we are just waiting for all materials to arrive so we can finally begin the new roof!  Should be soon.  I can't wait.



Get Connected:

Follow Us on Twitter We're on Facebook!



© 2018   Created by Community Host.   Powered by

Old Houses | Restoration Products  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service